拍品 9
  • 9

ENGLAND, 18TH CENTURY | Armchair

估價
3,000 - 5,000 GBP
Log in to view results
招標截止

描述

  • Armchair
  • the seat signed to the underside in manuscript Mr John Yates / Warb[o]rough [?] Sale [?]
  • mahogany 
  • Made circa 1750.
arms probably reduced at each end

來源

Christie’s, London, Important Furniture, 25 November 2004, lot 220

Condition

This is a lovely chair of bold proportions. One scrolled ear replaced. In good restored condition. End of arms shortened. Old marks and scratches. Repaired breaks to the arm joints, these repairs include later screws visible to the underside. These historic repairs do not detract from the piece overall. This armchair made £23,900 at auction (hammer plus premium) in 2004 at Christie's where it was acquired by Stanley J. Seeger.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

拍品資料及來源

There is an advert for C. Fredericks & Son, London in Apollo from June 1970 which features an armchair which is possibly ensuite. Also see a mid-18th century given example by Richard Hewett (Nancy Goyne Evans, 'A History and Background of English Windsor Furniture', Furniture History, 1979, pp. 24-53, pl. 84) for comparison. An almost identical mahogany chair, although with scrolled arms, was sold Christie’s London, Important Furniture, 22 April 2004, lot 29.