View full screen - View 1 of Lot 11. Copernicus | De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, Nuremberg, 1543, later boards, Rostock duplicate.

Copernicus | De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, Nuremberg, 1543, later boards, Rostock duplicate

Copernicus | De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, Nuremberg, 1543, later boards, Rostock duplicate

Copernicus | De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, Nuremberg, 1543, later boards, Rostock duplicate

Copernicus, Nicolaus

De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, libri VI. Nuremberg: Johann Petreius, 1543

folio (262 x 192mm.), woodcut initials and diagrams, all the errata corrected in an early hand (up to p.146, as in the printed errata sheet), eighteenth-century carta rustica with faded manuscript paper cover, printer's waste pasted across the joints, lacking quire F4 and final errata leaf, title-page stained with a repaired tear and defective at foredge (with no loss of text), first few quires damp-stained, final leaf lightly browned, occasional light dampstaining, binding worn



Copernicus had studied at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow which was one of the foremost universities at the time for the study of astronomy. He subsequently spent the years 1496-1503 in Italy, initially at the University of Bologna, lodging with the professor of astronomy Domenico Maria de Novara, and then at Ferrara and Padua. On his return to Poland, he was appointed a canon at the cathedral of Frombork, where he spent the rest of his life. The visit of a young scholar from Wittenberg, Georg Joachim Rheticus, was responsible for the eventual publication of Copernicus's manuscript on heliocentrism; the book was printed in Nuremberg only shortly before Copernicus's death at the age of 70.

Copernicus's book was predominantly a technical work concerned with how to calculate the movement of the planets, prefaced by a description of the cosmological arrangement of planets around the sun. As early as 1510 he had realised that there were problems with the Ptolemaic system centred on the Earth, as the orbits of the other planets did not match the theory; his ideas had circulated in a manuscript essay entitled Commentariolus, but he had no plans to publish his fuller workings, partly from fear of being scorned, until the arrival in Frombork of Rheticus.

Heliocentrism displaced God and the human race from the centre of the universe, much as Darwin's theory of evolution put man in his place among all the creatures of the earth, no longer kept aloof and special. Despite Galileo and Kepler's best efforts, heliocentrism was not accepted as accurate until the appearance of Newton's Principia in 1687 which finally completed the ideas that Copernicus had proposed.

This copy has the title words "orbium coelestium" crossed through in red crayon, which occurs in several copies; apparently these two words were added by Andreas Osiander, the anonymous author of the problematic preface claiming that the text was purely hypothetical, and were not used by Copernicus (see Gingerich, Census, p.xvii-xviii). Rheticus also used red crayon to cross these two words out in the copies that he presented to other scholars.

The missing quire has been replaced by four blank leaves with the same watermark as the endleaves (W in a circle with lettering).


VD16 K 2099; this copy not listed in Gingerich's census, though the other Rostock University Library copy is I.82


"Constat 14 ggi" [grossi?], early inscription at foot of title-page; Ex Bibliotheca Academiae Rostochiensis, stamp on title-page, shelfmark LIIb-56a and duplicate note on flyleaf (referring to the other Rostock copy, shelfmark LIIb-56; Gingerich I.82)

LIIb is the shelfmark used by Rostock for astronomy and astrology; this system of shelfmarks was introduced in the late nineteenth century.

Condition is described in the main body of the cataloguing, where appropriate

The lot is sold in the condition it is in at the time of sale. The condition report is provided to assist you with assessing the condition of the lot and is for guidance only. Any reference to condition in the condition report for the lot does not amount to a full description of condition. The images of the lot form part of the condition report for the lot. Certain images of the lot provided online may not accurately reflect the actual condition of the lot. In particular, the online images may represent colors and shades which are different to the lot's actual color and shades. The condition report for the lot may make reference to particular imperfections of the lot but you should note that the lot may have other faults not expressly referred to in the condition report for the lot or shown in the online images of the lot. The condition report may not refer to all faults, restoration, alteration or adaptation. The condition report is a statement of opinion only. For that reason, the condition report is not an alternative to taking your own professional advice regarding the condition of the lot. NOTWITHSTANDING THIS ONLINE CONDITION REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE/BUSINESS APPLICABLE TO THE RESPECTIVE SALE.