拍品 79
  • 79

MARRA, JOURNAL OF THE RESOLUTION'S VOYAGE, 1775

估價
2,000 - 3,000 GBP
Log in to view results
招標截止

描述

  • Journal of the Resolution's voyage, in 1772, 1773, 1774, and 1775. On discovery to the southern hemisphere, by which the non-existence of an undiscovered continent... is demonstratively proved. London: F. Newbery, 1775
FIRST EDITION, 8vo (210 x 130mm.), folding engraved map, 5 engraved plates, D2 a cancel as usual, early nineteenth-century half calf, map with small repair

出版

BCJC 1270; Hill (2004) 1087; Holmes 16; Sabin 16247; Streeter IV 2408

Condition

Condition is described in the main body of the cataloguing, where appropriate
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

拍品資料及來源

This account contains the earliest published view of the Antarctic. It is also the first published account of Cook's second voyage and the first printed account of the first crossing of the Antarctic Circle, appearing anonymously and surreptitiously some eighteen months before the official account. Cook first accused the gunner Robert Anderson of the authorship, who persuaded Marra to confess. This account records many incidents omitted by Cook and gives the reasons which caused Sir Joseph Banks and his retinue to withdraw from the expedition at the last moment. Marra's account appears to have been ghost written as he “was incapable of writing a consecutive account of anything. His contribution was therefore limited to factual extracts from his journal, the great bulk of the work being supplied by an editor” (Holmes) in the pay of the publisher.