384
384

PROPERTY FROM A PRIVATE EAST COAST COLLECTION

Francis Picabia
EFFET D’AUTOMNE AU BORD DU LOING, SAINT-MAMMÈS
前往
384

PROPERTY FROM A PRIVATE EAST COAST COLLECTION

Francis Picabia
EFFET D’AUTOMNE AU BORD DU LOING, SAINT-MAMMÈS
前往

拍品詳情

印象派及現代藝術日拍

|
紐約

Francis Picabia
1879 - 1953年
EFFET D’AUTOMNE AU BORD DU LOING, SAINT-MAMMÈS
Signed Picabia (lower right); signed F. Picabia and titled (on the reverse)
Oil on board
24 by 17 7/8 in.
61 by 45.5 cm
Painted circa 1905.
參閱狀況報告 參閱狀況報告

來源

Galeries Georges Petit, Paris
Sale: Hôtel Drouot, March 24, 1958, lot 176
Maurice & Laure Montet, Paris (acquired by 1965)
Didier Imbert Fine Arts, Paris (acquired by 1990)
Sale: Christie’s, London, June 26, 2001, lot 188
Acquired at the above sale

展覽

Paris, Galeries Georges Petit, Francis Picabia, 1909, no. 15 (probably)
Paris, Galerie de Paris, La Cage aux Fauves du Salon d’Automne 1905, 1965, no. 57
Paris, Palais de Congrès, Picabia, Dandy et Héraut de l'Art du XXe siècle, 1980-81, no. 13
Paris, Didier Imbert Fine Arts, Picabia, 1990, no. 1, illustrated in color in the catalogue

出版

William A. Camfield, Beverley Calté, Candace Clements, Arnauld Pierre & Pierre Calté, Francis Picabia, Catalogue Raisonné, 1898-1914, vol. I, New Haven & London, 2014, no. 172, illustrated in color p. 217

相關資料

Effet d’automne au bord du Loing, Saint-Mammès dates from Picabia's early years—a period marked by eager exploration of the Impressionist style and indicative of his technical dexterity as a painter. These early paintings of the French countryside, ranging from the outskirts of Paris to the northern shores of Normandy, were typical of the evolving Impressionist aesthetic at the turn of the century. During this time, Picabia deftly and confidently transitioned from Impressionism to Neo-Impressionism to Fauvism at a rapid clip, demonstrating a commitment to constant exploration and evolution that would prefigure his significant future contributions to Cubism, Surrealism and the Dada movement, all the while defying any consistent categorization of his output.

While Picabia’s Impressionist works are extraordinary in method, only recently have they been re-evaluated and contextualized. As William Camfield writes: "Picabia's image has been so dominated by his Dada activities that even some friends have found it difficult to believe that he once was an Impressionist. Their surprise notwithstanding, virtually every artist who contributed to 'modern' art during the first decade of the twentieth century passed through an Impressionist or Neo-impressionist phase early in his career; Picabia is exceptional only in the fact that for him Impressionism was not merely a passing phase but a major period" (William Camfield, Francis Picabia: His Art, Life and Times, New York, 1979, p. 8).

Interestingly, many of Picabia’s works from this period were not painted en plein air, the preferred mode of the early Impressionists, but rather from his studio. He painted a number of them from photographs and even printed postcard reproductions of works by other artists, in essence producing copies of copies and establishing an early foray into appropriation and proto-Dada technique.

印象派及現代藝術日拍

|
紐約