- 23
尚·杜布菲 | 《四名人》
描述
- 尚·杜布菲
- 《四名人》
- 款識:藝術家簽名並紀年29 VI 44
- 墨紙本刮畫
- 24 x 31.6公分,9 3/8 x 12 3/8英寸
來源
米榭·雅烏爾,塞納河畔納伊(家族傳承自上述藏家)
紐約佳士得,2016年11月15日,拍品編號64a
現藏家購自上述拍賣
展覽
巴黎,沃爾內藝文協會,〈尚·杜布菲1942至1954年油畫、素描及其他作品展〉,1954年3-4月
巴黎,伯格魯恩畫廊,〈尚·杜布菲素描回顧展〉,1960年10-11月
馬德里,凱沙基金會展覽館,〈尚·杜布菲:從實景到心景〉,1992年3-4月,52頁,品號41,載彩圖
布魯塞爾,植物園文化中心,〈尚·杜布菲:從特質到物質〉,1996年11月-1997年2月,61頁載彩圖
台北,國立歷史博物館,〈尚·杜布菲回顧展1919 – 1985年〉,1998年9-12月,74頁,品號20,載彩圖
薩爾布魯根,薩爾布魯根薩爾蘭博物館,〈尚·杜布菲:人像與頭像,尋找反文化〉,1999年9-11月,161頁,品號86,載彩圖
勒阿弗爾,馬爾羅博物館,〈尚·杜布菲的劇場〉,2001年5-9月,46頁載彩圖
薩爾斯堡,現代博物館;畢爾包,畢爾包古根海姆美術館,〈尚·杜布菲:歷險行蹤〉,2003年7月-2004年4月,50頁內文,52-53頁載彩圖
巴黎佳士得,「可惜啊,我出發了,我喜歡這樣。尚·杜布菲:從『巴黎馬戲團』到『烏路波』」,2014年9月,57頁載彩圖
出版
馬克斯·洛羅,《尚·杜布菲作品目錄,卷I:城市與鄉村的人偶》,洛桑1968年及巴黎1993年,159頁(1966年)及187頁(1993年),品號295,載圖
馬克斯·洛羅,《尚·杜布菲:犯罪、流放、暴力空間》,洛桑1971年,24頁載圖
貝爾納·海布朗,〈人們的短篇故事〉,《Opus International》,第93期,1984年春,19頁載圖
Condition
我們很高興為您提供上述拍品狀況報告。由於敝公司非專業修復人員,在此敦促您向其他專業修復人員索取諮詢,以獲得更詳盡、專業之報告。
準買家應該檢查每款拍品以確認其狀況,蘇富比所作的任何陳述均為專業主觀看法而非事實陳述。準買家應參考有關該拍賣的重要通知(見圖錄)。
雖然本狀況報告或有針對某拍品之討論,但所有拍賣品均根據印於圖錄內之業務規則以拍賣時狀況出售。
拍品資料及來源
Wry and irreverent, Quatre Notables mocks the putative noblemen it depicts, in much the same way as his work Haut Négoce – made just three months prior to the present work – ridiculed a set of haughty suited men participating in a negotiation. Directing a comical, critical eye over the way in which contemporary political decisions are made by people who are at heart base and absurd, Dubuffet’s staunch rejection of accepted aesthetic standards in Quatre Notables and Haut Négoce has both a personal and historical cause. Having repeatedly attempted to fashion a successful career as an artist, Dubuffet had, by 1942, “lost all interest in the art shown in galleries and museums”, and instead “loved the paintings done by children”, with his “only desire…to do the same for [his] own pleasure” (Jean Dubuffet cited in: Valérie de Costa and Fabrice Hergott, Jean Dubuffet: Works, Writings and Interviews, Barcelona 2006, p. 11). With an oft-overlooked, exceptionally diligent work ethic, Dubuffet formulated his own version of art history by focusing on supposedly ‘bad paintings’ and commenting of his own practice that “the most important thing is to be against things” (Ibid., p. 11). The origins of Dubuffet’s project, however, are also indissociable from its wider historical context. The supremacist prescriptivism of the Nazi ideology that imposed itself on Paris embodied, for Dubuffet, just an extreme form of the censorious injunctions upheld by the traditional art world: both delineated a charmed circle of accepted forms and excluded the rest as ‘degenerate’. In a bold act of defiance, Dubuffet concerned himself with depictions of ordinary people; eschewing any vestige of the kind of idealisation that the Nazis took to monstrous extremes.
Without doubt among the most important French artists of the Twentieth Century, Dubuffet is a perfect counterexample to the trope of the individualistic male artist – as epitomised by Pablo Picasso. Dubuffet’s choice of subject-matter, from ordinary citizens in Métro (1943), glimpses of redemptive jubilance in Nazi-occupied Paris in Vue de Paris – La vie de Plaisir (1944), as well as rural practices in Grande traite solitaire (1943), defeats this myth. In effect, Dubuffet reveals in Quatre Notables the very same love of the ordinary and the democratic as that expressed by his friend Jean Paulhan in the Nouvelle Revue Française: “man’s worth lies in what he has that is natural, immediate and naive, rather than in what he acquires. A great scholar has merit: but an ordinary man in and of himself is more valuable and even more extraordinary than a great scholar” (Jean Paulhan, ‘La démocratie fait appel au premier venu’, Nouvelle Revue Française, 1 March 1939, n.p.).