- 18
約翰·柯林
描述
- John Currin
- 《無辜、失敗、先知》
- 款識:畫家簽名並紀年1995(背面)
- 油彩畫布
- 40.6 x 30.5 公分;16 x 12 英寸
來源
Shaheen Modern and Contemporary Art, Cleveland
Acquired directly from the above by the present owner
展覽
Amsterdam, Stedelijk Museum, Wild Walls, 1995, p. 52 and 111, illustrated
Berlin, Contemporary Fine Arts, Answered Prayers, 1996
出版
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
拍品資料及來源
Painted in 1995, Innocent, Loser, Prophet is a relative rarity within Currin’s oeuvre in that its subject is male: known primarily during this period for paintings which depicted a sometimes cruelly caricatured version of womanhood, the artist here turns his attention to another element of somewhat ambiguous gender. Whilst the figure luxuriates in a profusion of bearded facial hair and other attributes of masculinity, his eyes are surrounded by thick clusters of lashes that result in a curiously feminine appearance. Somehow emasculated, the figure gazes out towards the viewer, positioned against an opulent blue background in which swirls of luxurious pigment echo the texture of the subject’s bare skin. In its presentation of a figure neither undeniably masculine nor wholly feminine, Innocent, Loser, Prophet queries conventional notions of sexuality and gender definitions in a highly traditional painterly language, whilst seemingly referencing the artist’s belief that: “The mystique of painting is both very macho and of course as elegant as bubble bath - it can be as luxuriating as you care to be. The studio really is my boudoir; that’s something I’ve always cherished about painting - it’s a completely ambisexual atmosphere…” (the artist cited in: A. M. Homes, ‘V. F. Portrait, John Currin,’ Vanity Fair, September 2011, n.p.). Innocent, Loser, Prophet ultimately stands as a highly accomplished example of contemporary portraiture: a fascinating painting that causes the viewer to re-examine pre-conceived ideals about the very concept and role of gender itself.