- 266
清十八世紀中葉 / 十九世紀中葉 涅青白料「螭龍」圖鼻煙壺
描述
來源
紐約蘇富比1980年5月28日,編號23
Gerd Lester 收藏,1986年
展覽
新加坡國家博物館,新加坡,1994-1995年
出版
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
拍品資料及來源
Perhaps the most interesting feature, however, is that although of a type one would expect to have been blown, this bottle seems to have been carved from a solid block. This provides a tentative link to other bottles from the Bloch collection, such as two sold at Bonhams Hong Kong, 28th November 2011, lots 55 and 92, the latter of which has another feature in common with this bottle: a footrim composed of the curling extremities of the dragons. The bottle is unexpectedly heavy in the hand, but the possibility of it having been carved is strengthened by the lack of concentric rings round the mouth and the presence of a few tiny air bubbles—all of which are perfectly spherical—around the neck. The hollowing is also characteristic of lapidary work, for we find traces of the initial annular drill-markings still evident, and the interior walls are slightly uneven and fan-shaped. The carver has also left an unusually deep foot—a further possible indication of palace style related to jade carving. The lower area of the hollowing is of a more rectangular shape than one would expect of a blown form, and is somewhat uneven. These features are not significant on bottles other than transparent ones, of course, since they would be invisible under all normal circumstances. The slight carelessness of the interior finishing, however, may also confirm our dating to a period when slightly lower standards were beginning to be acceptable, especially if they were not visually obtrusive, a feature we can begin to detect in some late Qianlong period bottles.