拍品 52
  • 52

愛德華.孟克

估價
5,000,000 - 7,000,000 USD
Log in to view results
招標截止

描述

  • 愛德華·孟克
  • 《照鏡的女人》
  • 款識: 畫家簽名E. Munch並紀年1892(右下)
  • 油畫畫布
  • 36¼ x 28¾ 英寸
  • 92 x 73 公分

來源

拉夫•慧爾賀, 奧斯陸
奧雅納和維斯耶•慧爾賀, 奧斯陸(繼承自上述人士, 至1983年)
萊昂內爾•C•愛潑斯坦, 華盛頓(1991年前購自上述人士)
科維•本恩欣, AS (2005年前購入)
由現有藏家購自上述人士

展覽

「愛德華.孟克畫展」,克里斯蒂, 猶飛勒.吐斯路普斯公園, 1892年, 品號24
「畫家愛德華.孟克特別展覽」,柏林,柏林藝術家協會, 建築師會所、杜塞爾多夫, 愛德華.舒爾特畫廊、科隆, 愛德華.舒爾特畫廊、柏林, 公平宮、哥本哈根, 喬治.克勒斯, 斯堪的納維亞藝術展場、弗羅茨瓦夫, 利希滕貝格藝術協會、德累斯頓, 西奧多.利希滕貝格的繼任者官邸、慕尼黑, 利希滕貝格藝術協會, 1892-93年, 品號30
「愛德華.孟克展」,克里斯蒂, 美術家協會, 1912年, 品號5或6
「愛德華.孟克:鏡中倒影」,西棕櫚灘, 諾頓藝術畫廊, 1986年, 品號26, 圖錄附彩色圖版
「蒙克與法國」,巴黎, 奧賽博物館、奧斯陸,蒙克博物館、法蘭克福, 錫恩美術館, 1991-92年, 品號19, 圖錄附彩色圖版
「愛德華•孟克:繪畫, 1892-1917」,哥本哈根, 法爾斯酬畫廊、紐約, 米切爾-因尼斯和納什畫廊、蘇黎世, 德普里畫廊、盧森堡藝術, 2000-01年, 圖錄附彩色圖版頁11, 無品號
「愛德華.孟克:現代藝術的標記」,巴塞爾, 比約里基金會、昆茲爾搜,伍爾特藝術館,2007年, 品號20, 圖錄附彩色圖版
「從蒙克到『孟克』: 藝術策略, 1880-1892」,奧斯陸, 孟克博物館, 2008-09年, 品號151, 圖錄附彩色圖版

出版

英格麗•蘭伽, 《愛德華•孟克:早期表現主義和象徵主義研究》, 奧斯陸, 1960年, 圖版頁159
格爾德•沃爾, 《愛德華•孟克繪畫全集, 專題目錄, 1880-1897年》, 第1冊, 倫敦, 2009年, 品號270, 圖版頁255

Condition

This work is in very good condition. Original canvas. Shallow surface scratch 2 inches long in the window. Under UV light, there are three small dots of inpainting visible in the lower right and a few scattered specks at upper left. There is also a faint line of inpainting at right edge above the chair, otherwise fine.
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.

拍品資料及來源

Painted in 1892, Kvinne som speiler seg was painted during a crucial transition for Munch, a time when he abandoned Impressionist influences and found a voice that would change forever the foundations of Modernism. Painted just two years after what is widely accepted as the artist's first Expressionist masterwork, Natt i Saint-Cloud (Night in St. Cloud), and one year before he would create The Scream, the present work relies upon an unprecedented dynamism in both form and color. Munch uses vibrant greens to electrify the space upon and around his model while the soft light coming from the window transforms to fiery oranges and reds as it hits the floor. This domestic scene, which finds its lineage in the work of artists such as Edgar Degas and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (fig. 1), possesses an emotional intensity unlike any work of these contemporaries.

Munch probably executed this work following a four-month stay in Nice, upon his return to Paris and after viewing the Salon des Indépendants in April. Anne Eggum, however, posits the work was executed earlier in the year while he was still in Nice. The model appears in another work from the same year, Kvinne som grer håret (Woman Combing her Hair) housed at the Kunstmuseum in Bergen (Woll, no. 269). The version in Bergen however is decidely closer to Impressionism in its execution and tone while Kvinne som speiler seg is in another realm altogether. The energetic aura which surrounds the female model in this work presages the artist's iconic image which he would execute for the first time in the following year, Madonna (fig. 2).  

The sense of voyeurism that pervades Kvinne som speiler seg is an intentional element for Munch. There is a clear precedent for this not only in the "keyhole aesthetic" of Degas and Toulouse-Lautrec but also David Caspar Friedrich and Vilhelm Hammershøi (fig. 4). These artists relished the depiction of intimate moments, and the subject of the woman at her toilette lent itself easily. When Munch draws upon this lineage in the current work, he achieves a spontaneity that contradicts the careful detail of these other masters. The woman in the present work does not acknowledge the viewer, looking instead towards what we imagine to be a mirror, placed outside the frame of our viewership.

There is a clear sense of Munch discovering his own artistic identity with such pivotal works between 1890 and 1892. Jay A. Clarke writes, "This growing tension between what was adopted and what was indigenous faced Munch when he arrived home from his extended French stay in the spring of 1892, no doubt conflicted about his place in Norway's artistic community. He would not revisit Paris for three years; instead, he traveled to Germany, where he immersed himself in Berlin's art scene. Soon after his return from Paris, however, he began to explore a new series of motifs, creating works that would come to define his art in perpetuity... These canvases exemplify Munch coming into his own, focusing on images of interior reflection, suggestive sexuality, mystical seascapes, and anxiety-ridden street scenes that are worlds away from the fleeting brushstrokes and bright palette of Rue Lafayette [1891]" (J. A. Clarke, Becoming Edvard Munch: Influence, Anxiety and Myth (exhibition catalogue), The Art Institute of Chicago, 2009, p. 50).

The compositional element of the window in this work becomes an important trope for Munch during the early 1890s, beginning with Natt i Saint-Cloud (Night in St. Cloud) and extending into works such as Kyss ved vinduet (Kiss by the Window, fig. 5). Dieter Buchhart describes the significance of this element, "The window as a frontier between public and private or external and inner worlds is likewise an element in scenes of melancholy as well as in works such as the lovers embracing in The Kiss or even portraits like Alexandra Thaulow. In these works... the sketchy figure evolves out of the background, emerging from it and at virtually the same time disappearing into it, almost without spatial context" (Dieter Buchhart, Edvard Munch: Signs of Modern Art (exhibition catalogue), op. cit., p. 43).

The technical innovation displayed in Kvinne som speiler seg will become a mainstay of Munch's most successful compositions. He looks beyond the conventionalities of oil on canvas, a medium historically intertwined with painterly artifice. With broad brushstrokes and areas of unexposed canvas, Munch eschews a naturalistic reading of his subject. He focuses instead on an emotional resonance, seeking an interpretation that transcends worldly realms - a driving force that will lead him to the first version of The Scream painted the following year. When the Norwegian realist painter, Christian Krohg interviewed Munch in 1892, he wrote "It is the impression of the soul, and nothing else, that he seeks to create; not some picture of random nature" (ibid., p. 26).

Munch's disengagement with the traditions of Western painting in choosing to express emotion and mood instead of visible reality sent shockwaves through the European artistic community. In November of 1892, Munch sent fifty-five works including Kvinne som speiler seg, to a group exhibition in Berlin at the Architektenhaus. The exhibition created an instant scandal, prompting the Kaiser to close down the show only two weeks after it had opened. This act of censorship would eventually lead to the creation of the Berlin Secession in 1898. Painted at the crux of this artistic revolution, Kvinne som speiler seg marks a turning point for Munch's personal discovery and the advent of Expressionism.