Reflections on the Revolution in France … the second edition. J. Dodsley, 1790
[bound with two other works:] La Constitution Français. Paris: de Baudouin, 1791; [Burke.] An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs. J. Dodsley, 1791; 8vo, PHILIP FRANCIS’S COPIES WITH EXTENSIVE ANNOTATIONS IN INK TO SOME 35 PAGES, including endpapers and margins, comparing Revolutionary France to Cromwellian England (“…All violent popular revolutions seem to be attended with great Irreligion & Impiety…”), with observations on subjects including the nature of sovereignty and the meaning of equality, quoting such philosophers as Cesare Beccaria and Jean-Louis de Lolme, also with additional marginalia in pencil and a few corrections in ink, half blue morocco on marbled boards, extensive loss at spine, covers loose, text-block split
AN IMPORTANT ANNOTATED COPY OF BURKE'S GREAT WORK. Sir Philip Francis (1740-1818), best remembered as the probable author of the Junius letters, had been a friend and political ally of fellow Irishman Edmund Burke but they split apart when Burke wrote his denunciation of the French revolution. Burke showed his manuscript to Francis, who remained loyal to the radical Whig tradition and disdained Burke's sympathetic view of the ancien regime, and they exchanged heated letters on the book's publication. This extensively annotated book reveals Francis's continued engagement with Burke on the great political questions of the day.
Philip Francis, ownership inscriptions, (including to the second item "bought by me at Rouen in the August of the year 1792"); catalogue slip dated by hand 31 October 1916; Lawrences of Crewkerne, 10 October 1996, lot 611
Please see shipping calculator link: click here
Condition is described in the main body of the catalogue, where appropriate.
The lot is sold in the condition it is in at the time of sale. The condition report is provided to assist you with assessing the condition of the lot and is for guidance only. Any reference to condition in the condition report for the lot does not amount to a full description of condition. The images of the lot form part of the condition report for the lot provided by Sotheby's. Certain images of the lot provided online may not accurately reflect the actual condition of the lot. In particular, the online images may represent colours and shades which are different to the lot's actual colour and shades. The condition report for the lot may make reference to particular imperfections of the lot but you should note that the lot may have other faults not expressly referred to in the condition report for the lot or shown in the online images of the lot. The condition report may not refer to all faults, restoration, alteration or adaptation because Sotheby's is not a professional conservator or restorer but rather the condition report is a statement of opinion genuinely held by Sotheby's. For that reason, Sotheby's condition report is not an alternative to taking your own professional advice regarding the condition of the lot.