218

Details & Cataloguing

Contemporary Art Day Auction

|
London

Hurvin Anderson
B. 1965
BALL WATCHING 
oil on canvas
121.5 by 183.3 cm. 47 7/8 by 72 1/4 in.
Executed in 1997.
Read Condition Report Read Condition Report

Provenance

Acquired directly from the artist by the present owner in 1998

Catalogue Note

A pivotal early work, Hurvin Anderson’s masterful Ball Watching sees him combine a slew of artistic influences with a deeply personal narrative. Beautifully defined oil washes in the upper and lower registers give way to gorgeously painted figures, jewel-like specks of colour lending character and individuality to the silhouettes. Peter Doig’s influence is of paramount importance here, with the tripartite structure of the composition with its flattened perspective echoing early masterpieces by the Scottish artist, such as The House That Jacques Built from 1992 (Tel-Aviv Museum of Art), and the ambiguity of the group’s intentions echoing that of the subjects’ in such paintings as Music of the Future, executed between 2002-07. Indeed, the present work sees Anderson at the height of his powers, and is clearly a painting of immense importance to the artist, as evidenced by both his returning to this subject in the early 2000s and his consistent discussion of the work in interviews, and one that proved pivotal in the development of his career as a whole.

The work is based on a photograph taken of Anderson and some of his friends playing football in a park. As often happens, on occasion the ball would end up being kicked into the pond, and the present work depicts the players standing on the shore, trying to work out how to extract it. However, as is so often case with Anderson’s work, this image is repurposed and takes on a series of ulterior meanings when transposed into painting. In the artist’s words, “It was odd because it brought up so many other things for me. Like the idea of everyone waiting on the edge of the water. It looked like they were waiting for something, or waiting for something to happen. They also seemed to be going somewhere. Or wanting to be somewhere else… there was the question of space and territory” (Hurvin Anderson cited in: Courtney J Martin, ‘On Painterliness…’, Small Axe Project, November 2009, online). The water figures as a barrier to entry, an obstacle to progress, and the uncertainty of the subjects as to how to proceed serves as a metaphor for the liminal status of Afro-Carribean immigrants to the United Kingdom, where structural inequalities have for years meant that non-white citizens have many more hurdles to clear.  As Anderson explained, “it is a political discussion. To get to the place where we played football, we had to cross mainline railway tracks and climb over a fence… for some odd reason it never seemed like I had enough time to cross…[this] brought up ideas associated with crossing the tracks” (Ibid.). This phrase, “to cross the tracks”, which implies a movement from good to bad, rich to poor, one community to another, and the fact that he had to do this in order to reach the field provided for Anderson a powerful crutch to illustrate a pervasive feeling. Just as the literal construction of barriers in the form of window grilles epitomised his feeling of dislocation upon visiting Trinidad in the early 2000s, as he immortalised in the Welcome series, the stranded figures on the shore, looking forlornly at a football floating out of reach, reflect the sense of transgression and opposition that many share following their immigration into a new country.

As a viewer, we are made complicit by this painting in an othering process inherent to any discussion of the status of immigrants in the United Kingdom.  This heightened awareness of the roles of viewer and subject mirrors the pioneering works of Anderson’s American contemporary Kerry James Marshall, whose paintings depict real or fictionalised scenes from African American history in an attempt to rewrite a whitewashed history of art. Echoing not only Peter Doig but works by artists such as Paul Gauguin and the American Abstract Expressionists, the present work forces the viewer to confront the role of a dominant white narrative in art criticism and appreciation.

However, the fact that the subjects are turned away from the viewer prevents Ball Watching from becoming confrontational. As Jennifer Higgie noted in her essay for Anderson’s seminal exhibition at Ikon Gallery in 2013, “despite the allusions in the paintings to the complex histories of leisure, politics and control…meaning is open-ended and allusive rather than emphatic” (Exh. Cat, Birmingham, Ikon Gallery, Hurvin Anderson reporting back, p. 11). This is to say that the image’s function is not solely reliant upon its interpretation. In the present work, a daring and superbly executed piece that stands up as a truly remarkable painting as well as a tightly conceived conceptual work, we see the apex of this ambiguity of purpose. As Anderson himself said with regard to this work: “Once you paint an image, it starts to become something else. It seemed to be about these guys who didn’t know how to cross this river, this lake, this pond… I became interested in how these kinds of things play out… Can you push this thing away? Can you make an image that is without any context or non-political… a personal image?” (Hurvin Anderson cited in: Victoria Valentine, ‘Culture Talk: British Painter Hurvin Anderson on Personal and Political Histories’, Culture Type, January 2017, online).

Contemporary Art Day Auction

|
London