- Federico Zuccaro
- The Resurrection of Lazarus
- Pen and brown ink and wash, heightened with white, over traces of black chalk, on paper washed light ochre-brown
thence by inheritance to their nephew,
François de la Noüe,
thence by inheritance to his brother,
Aubin de la Noüe;
Charles-François, Marquis de Calvière (1693-1777), his mount and attribution in pen and brown ink to: Thadée Zuccaro
thence by descent,
sale, Paris, Christie's, Dessins Anciens de l'Ancienne Collection di Marquis de Calvière, 17 December 2003, lot 2;
Private Collection, Belgium
Among the surviving sheets witnessing Federico's laborious work for this commission are two further compositional studies of a similar size to this, one a squared drawing in the Nationalmuseum, Stockholm2, the other in the Louvre.3 Together with the present sheet, these drawings, with their various differences in composition and degree of finish, document the final stage in the development of the composition, before the execution of the fresco itself (the drawing in the Louvre being the closest in composition to the final fresco). As Mundy has, however, noted, the precise role of each drawing in the painting's evolution remains unclear.
The present sheet is the only one drawn on washed paper, and it appears close in quality to the sheet in the Stockholm. The drawing differs from the final fresco in numerous ways, such as the pose of the figure of Lazarus, who appears here more upright and frontal, and there is evidence of numerous minor changes in the other figures and in the architectural setting.
We are grateful to James Mundy for confirming the attribution to Federico in a recent communication.4
1. For an account of the related drawings and the development towards the final composition see J. Mundy, loc. cit.
2. Stockholm, Nationalmuseum inv. no. NM 477/1863; C. Acidini Luchinat, Taddeo e Federico Zuccari, fratelli pittori del Cinquecento, Milan 1998, p. 231, reproduced fig. 12
3. Paris, Louvre, inv. no. 4543; J. Mundy, op. cit., p. 172, p. 185 note 28, reproduced p. 176, fig. 17
4. E-mail, 3 November 2016