Lot 127
  • 127

Keith Vaughan

Estimate
15,000 - 25,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • Keith Vaughan
  • Study for 'The Return of Odysseus'
  • titled, dated 1951 and inscribed on the reverse
  • oil on board
  • 49.5 by 61cm.; 19½ by 24in.

Provenance

Austin/Desmond Fine Art, London
Private Collection

Literature

Anthony Hepworth and Ian Massey, Keith Vaughan, The Mature Oils 1946-1977, Sansom & Company, Bristol, 2012, cat. no.AH98, p.67.

Condition

Not examined out of the frame. The board appears sound. The edges of the board are uneven, including an old horizontal incision at the lower right vertical edge, all of which are thought to be in keeping with the Artist's materials. There are several very minor flecks of loss around the edges of the board. There is some slight flattening to some of the raised tips of impasto. There is a light scuff to the back of the figure on the far right, and another light scuff to the table leg in the lower right quadrant. There are one or two light specks of surface dirt and studio detritus. Subject to the above, the work appears to be in very good overall condition. Ultraviolet light reveals retouching around the extreme edges of the work, with some further small isolated spots and specks elsewhere, primarily in the upper right corner to two old scratches. These have all been very sensitively executed. The work is float mounted and housed in a dark wooden frame, held under glass. Please telephone the department on +44 (0) 207 293 6424 if you have any questions regarding the present work.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

Vaughan painted several works around this time based on Classical myth and legend (see Theseus and the Minotaure, 1950 and Theseus, for the Dome of Discovery, 1951). It was his habit to explore pictorial possibilities in drawings, gouaches and oil sketches before embarking on a final version. The process assisted him in resolving problems such as figural placement, composition and colouration. Study for The Return of Odysseus may have originally been the preliminary workings out of an intended full-scale work that was never translated into a resolved painting.

 

The narrative comes from Homer’s Odyssey. It deals with the moment Odysseus returns to Ithaca after the Trojan Wars, disguised as a beggar, to find his palace overrun with suitors. His wife Penelope has arranged to marry whoever is able to take her husband’s great bow and fire an arrow through the eyes of twelve axe shafts. None of the suitors are able to even string the taut bow, let alone fire it. Only Odysseus shoots an arrow successfully. Study for The Return of Odysseus depicts the moment after this incident – when the hero wreaks his revenge.

 

Vaughan’s management of the narrative is as intense as anything he painted. Odysseus appears at the door of the palace, bow in hand and begins the systematic slaughter of the suitors one by one. First he kills Antinous who, he discovers, is drinking from his own goblet.

 

The force and speed of the execution sends his rival reeling and shatters the table in half. Vaughan is careful to include Odysseus’ goblet in the scene. The others have had little time to react, and are just beginning to realize the fate that is in store for them. The figures of the suitors are distorted for expressive purposes and Vaughan’s approach to anatomy is informed by his life-long study of the male form. The handling of the pigment, which communicates much of the dramatic force of the image, is both bold and animated and gestural brushstrokes contribute to the drama of the scene.

We are grateful to Gerard Hastings for compiling these notes. His latest book, Awkward Artefacts: The ‘Erotic Fantasies’ of Keith Vaughan: 1940-1960, is published by Pagham Press in April.