- 127
Keith Vaughan
Description
- Keith Vaughan
- Study for 'The Return of Odysseus'
- titled, dated 1951 and inscribed on the reverse
- oil on board
- 49.5 by 61cm.; 19½ by 24in.
Provenance
Private Collection
Literature
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
The narrative comes from Homer’s Odyssey. It deals with the moment Odysseus returns to Ithaca after the Trojan Wars, disguised as a beggar, to find his palace overrun with suitors. His wife Penelope has arranged to marry whoever is able to take her husband’s great bow and fire an arrow through the eyes of twelve axe shafts. None of the suitors are able to even string the taut bow, let alone fire it. Only Odysseus shoots an arrow successfully. Study for The Return of Odysseus depicts the moment after this incident – when the hero wreaks his revenge.
Vaughan’s management of the narrative is as intense as anything he painted. Odysseus appears at the door of the palace, bow in hand and begins the systematic slaughter of the suitors one by one. First he kills Antinous who, he discovers, is drinking from his own goblet.
The force and speed of the execution sends his rival reeling and shatters the table in half. Vaughan is careful to include Odysseus’ goblet in the scene. The others have had little time to react, and are just beginning to realize the fate that is in store for them. The figures of the suitors are distorted for expressive purposes and Vaughan’s approach to anatomy is informed by his life-long study of the male form. The handling of the pigment, which communicates much of the dramatic force of the image, is both bold and animated and gestural brushstrokes contribute to the drama of the scene.
We are grateful to Gerard Hastings for compiling these notes. His latest book, Awkward Artefacts: The ‘Erotic Fantasies’ of Keith Vaughan: 1940-1960, is published by Pagham Press in April.