Lot 366
  • 366

[Scopes, John]

Estimate
500 - 800 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • A collection of works relating to trial of John Scopes for teaching evolution, including:
  • Paper
i) [Anon] The World's most Famous Court Trial. Tennessee Evolution Case. Cincinnati: National Book Company, [1925], 2 plates, original blue cloth, [Grolier Club, Darwin (2004), p.30], binding somewhat rubbed--ii) Darrow, C. The Story of My Life. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1932, PRESENTATION COPY INSCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR, original cloth, dust-jacket, [Grolier Club, Darwin (2004), pp.30-32], binding frayed with soiling and marks to spine, supplied dust-jacket frayed at extremities--iii) Allen, L.H., editor. Bryan and Darrow at Dayton. New York: Arthur Lee & Company, [1925], plates, original cloth, spine dulled--iv) Graebner, T. Essay on Evolution. St. Louis, 1925, illustrations, original cloth, together 4 vol., all FIRST EDITIONS; and 12 others (16)

Condition

the condition of this lot is as described in the catalogue description
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

Clarence Darrow was the defence lawyer for teacher John Scopes in 1925. Scopes was charged in 1925 for teaching evolution in a Tennessee school; he lost the resulting court case, and was fined $100. The law under which he was prosecuted remained in place until 1967.