- 5
Jindřich Štyrský
Description
- Jindřich Štyrský
- Untitled (from the Portable Cabinet) (Stěhovací kabinet)
- titled Stěhovací kabinet lower left; with a dedication to E.F. Burian, signed and dated Jindřich Štyrský / 2.6.38 on the mount lower right
- collage
- 42.5 by 32.5cm., 16¾ by 12¾in.
Provenance
Régis Cosatte, Paris
Galerie 1900-2000 (Marcel Fleiss), Paris
Purchased from the above in Miami in December 2003
Exhibited
Montauban, Musée Ingres, Collage - Decollage: Rencontres d’art, 1992, no. 111
Valencia, Ivam, Centre Julio Gonzales, The Art of the Avant-Garde in Czechoslovakia 1918-1938, 1993, illustrated in the catalogue
Lisbon, Museu National de Arte Antigua, Les tentations de Bosch et l’éternel retour, 1994
Paris, Centre National d’Art et de Culture Georges Pompidou, Féminin-Masculin: Le sexe de l’art, 1995-96
Prague, City Gallery, Český Surrealismus 1929-1953, 1996, no. 351, illustrated in the catalogue
Dijon, Musée des Beaux-Arts, Prague, Capitale secrète des avant-gardes, 1900-1938, 1997, no. 285, illustrated in the catalogue
Prague, Dům U Kamenného zvonu (Stone Bell House), Jindřich Štyrský (1899-1942), 2007
Washington, National Gallery of Art; New York, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum; Milwaukee, Art Museum; Edinburgh, Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art: Foto: Modernity in Central Europe, 1918-45, 2007-08, no. 102, illustrated in the catalogue
Houston, Cullen Collection, 2011, no. 73, illustrated in the catalogue
Literature
L'Echange surréaliste, Tokyo, 1936, p. 81, illustrated
Philippe Soupault, Ecrits sur l'Art du XXe siècle, Paris, 1994, p. 5, catalogued; p. 95, illustrated
'Numéro spécial Prague', in Dossier de l'art, June 1997, p. 62, illustrated
Lenka Bydovská & Karel Srp, Jindřich Štyrský, Prague, 2007, p. 312, no. 408, illustrated; pp. 300, 311 & 328, discussed; p. 528, illustrated on the cover of Surrealismus magazine; p. 529, cited
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
Using a print titled One’s Good Fortune, the Other’s Misfortune as inspiration, the work caricatures the awkward embrace of a couple surprised by a man in a dinner jacket. It is one of the most iconic images from the series. Like other collages from the Portable Cabinet, the work is a variation on the theme of sentimentality and cruelty and the hypocrisy of bourgeois values.
Superimposed on a bourgeois interior, complete with Louis XVI style chair and sideboard, a fern in a Chinese vase, an exotic pot and a candelabra, the two main protagonists are primarily comprised of anatomic parts culled from a medical text book. To the lady's left a putto with a skin disease assists. The incorporation of cut out body parts to express a subverted message is an early modernist example of a genre that would subsequently become more widespread (fig. 1). For Štyrský both the visual impression and message are ruthless. Regardless of whether he is considering infidelity, as in the present lot, or marriage (fig. 2), Štyrský's imagery and underlying comment is equally anti-middleclass, and characteristically unforgiving.
As Lenka Bydovská and Karel Srp comment: 'In Portable Cabinet Štyrský attempted to create a body that differed from reality but was at the same time far removed from the widespread grotesque form used by Arcimboldo. In assembling it he combined the use of various different source materials. In adition to the xylographs popularised by Max Ernst, he soon added other materials, in particular various kinds of contemporary colour prints and holy pictures, thus expressing his critical stance towards the Catholic religion and bourgeois society. In doing so he clearly opened up new areas of sensibility, for which there was no model in older forms of art. In contrast to Ernst, who around 1930 had worked on novels in collage form, Štyrský's interest centred primarily on female and male figures, and also many symbols linked with sexuality and death. Unlike Ernst, Štyrský did not arrange the collages in Portable Cabinet in a narrative sequence. Each one remained an autonomous picture. More than Ernst, he aimed at creating "new beings" to which he often referred to in his texts in the 1930s. He gave life to beings that had previously not existed.' (Bydovská & Srp, p. 300).
For another collage by Štyrský from The Portable Cabinet see lot 8.