- 21
Martin Kippenberger
Description
- Martin Kippenberger
- Eifrau, die man nicht schubladieren kann (Egg Woman Who Defies Categorisation)
- signed with the artist's initials and dated 96
- oil on canvas
- 180 by 150cm.; 70 7/8 by 59 1/8 in.
Provenance
Exhibited
Dortmund, Dortmunder Kunstverein E.V., Martin Kippenberger: Nicht oft Gesehen, 2004-05, p. 27, illustrated in colour
New York, Skarstedt Gallery, Martin Kippenberger: Eggman II, 2011, p. 21, illustrated in colour
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
While the title and style of the strapped shoes here point to the figure being a woman, close analogies with Kippenberger’s self-depiction elsewhere also invoke the character of a self-portrait; indeed, in other works, there is a precedent for Kippenberger appearing in drag. The underwear around these bare legs is highly reminiscent of the trousers around the ankles of the figure in the left-hand panel of his celebrated painting Nieder mit der Inflation (Down With Inflation) of 1984, an image that was sourced in a photograph of the artist. Furthermore, the egg shape itself is readily evocative of the balloon shapes in his most famous series of self-portraits of 1988 where Kippenberger consciously imitated his great hero Picasso by depicting himself in voluminous white underpants. Indeed, that the artist’s self-portraiture lies so squarely at the heart of so much of his corpus certainly affords one interpretation of the Egg Woman standing as allegorical proxy for Martin Kippenberger.
Kippenberger was an artist born to be a painter at a time of non-painting, when installation and Duchampian concepts held sway in the 1960s and 70s. Joseph Beuys was the self-appointed leader of this generation that had become the establishment by the time Kippenberger and his generation began their artistic careers. Kippenberger and fellow painters such as Albert Oehlen stood in reaction to their ‘‘elders’’ and their advocacy of painting as the noblest art was a form of patricide. Kippenberger championed an earlier era with the artist as a mythic hero and painting at the summit of culture. Of course, as with so much of the artist’s oeuvre, overly deterministic subjective readings of the figurative content of his paintings often compete with the most important themes. However, the title and depiction of a draw inside an egg here attract irresistible narrative interpretation realting to the ‘Indefinable Nature’’ of the artist and his art, and Kippenberger’s total rejection of compartmentalisation in virtually everything he did and created. Eifrau, die man nicht chubladieren kann summates this phenomenal aptitude and provides apt visual parallel to a statement of Peter Pakesch and Zdenek Felix made for a retrospective held one year after the artist’s untimely death: ‘‘It was always his commitment to modern art and his antipathy to staleness in cultural activity that made him productive and critical…Martin Kippenberger’s mission was to take on the world’’ (Peter Pakesch and Zdenek Felix in: Exhibition Catalogue, Basel, Kunsthalle, Martin Kippenberger, 1998, p. 4).