L13402

/

Lot 200
  • 200

Hippocrates

Estimate
8,000 - 12,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • Hippocrates
  • Omnia opera [Greek]. Venice: Aldus Manutius, May 1526
  • Paper
folio (303 x 205mm.), text in Latin and Greek, printer's device on title-page and last leaf, early annotations, nineteenth-century red morocco gilt by Clarke, armorial device of Herbert Norman Evans in gilt on covers, his crest at foot of spine, edges gilt, first few leaves slightly browned, binding slightly scuffed

Provenance

Herbert Norman Evans (1802-1877), arms on covers

Literature

Durling 2316; Norman 1077; Renouard 1526:1; Texas 216; UCLA 209; Wellcome 3173

Condition

Condition is described in the main body of the cataloguing, where appropriate.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

First edition in Greek of the Hippocratic corpus.

Published a year after the first edition in Latin, the Aldine Greek edition of Hippocrates was based on a fifteenth-century manuscript (now Paris, BNF, MS gr. 2141), incorporating corrections from a second manuscript (now Venice, Bibl. Marciana, MS gr. 269) which had belonged to Cardinal Bessarion. The text of the Aldine edition marked a considerable advance over the Latin translation of Marco Fabio Calvo in that “it repaired a considerable number of accidental omissions and one long repetition that Calvus made because he followed only one manuscript. Moreover; by presenting the original text, it laid the necessary foundation for all further philological and medical study of the corpus” (Durling).