- 128
Babylonian Talmud, Venice: Daniel Bomberg, Tractate Avodah Zara, 1520, bound with Tractates Horayot and 'Eduyyot, 1521
Description
Condition
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.
Catalogue Note
Horayot (Rulings), is a rather short tractate in three chapters, attached to the order of Nezikin, whose scriptural basis may be found in Leviticus ch. 4 and Numbers ch. 15. Those biblical sections deal with "sinning through error," and the Talmud extrapolates to discuss erroneous rulings by the high priest or the high court (Sanhedrin), leading to the inadvertent violation of precepts, which, if willfully transgressed, would have been deserving of karet. The Gemara of the Jerusalem Talmud to Horayot was appended to the Babylonian tractate by Bomberg because he found no tosafot to this tractate and the Jerusalem Gemara took its place on the page. For centuries, Bomberg's edition represented the authoritative version of this tractate.
'Eduyyot' (Testimonies). Unlike other tractates, which usually deal with a particular subject, 'Eduyyot (Testimonies), is a collection of a laws on a wide variety of topics. Its title reflects the purpose of the collection: to put on record the "testimonies" given by later sages on the halakhic pronouncements and controversies of earlier authorities. Thus, the phrase "rabbi so-and-so testified" (he'id) frequently occurs, especially in the later chapters. The fact that the correctness of the respective halakhic traditions were established before a court and consequently designated as "testimonies," may also explain why this tractate was included in the order Nezikin, which to a large extent treats of law and procedure.
(Vinograd, Venice 29, 41, 48; Habermann 25, 42, 43.)