- 365
Justus van Egmont
Estimate
15,000 - 20,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed
Description
- Justus van Egmont
- The Reconciliation of the Romans and the Sabines
- oil on canvas
Provenance
Robert Child (d. 1782), 36 Berkeley Square, London and Osterley Park House, Middlesex;
Thence by descent to the present owners.
Thence by descent to the present owners.
Exhibited
Whitehall, The Arts Council of Great Britain, Old Masters from Jersey Collections, 1952, no. 93 (as by Rubens)
Literature
E. McGrath, Corpus Rubenianum, Subjects from History, 1997, part XIII, vol. 2, cat. no. 28a, p. 148-9 and vol. 1, illus. fig. 109 (as 'After Rubens, actually Justus van Egmont?')
Condition
The picture is lighter in tone and less acidic in colour than the catalogue illustration would suggest. The canvas has been lined and the paint surface has been flattened as a result and the darker pigments are thin in places. There is no damage or loss of paint visible to the naked eye except for old retouchings to restored frame abrasion around the edges. Otherwise the canvas is in good structurally sound condition. Examination under ultraviolet reveals old scattered minor cosmetic retouching throughout the sky as we as some infilling to an old now stabilised craquelure. There is also some old minor strengthening to the robes of the figures as well as some minor retouching to the fleshtones. A mottled varnish impedes inspection. Offered in a gilt wood and plaster frame in good condition.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
Born in Leiden, Justus van Egmont initially trained under Caspar van den Hoecke (d. 1648). Following a sojourn in Italy he is recorded as working in Rubens’s studio in the 1620’s. He is one of the few artists whose collaboration with Rubens is well documented following his involvement, at least in the later stages, in the execution of the Medici cycle which was commissioned in 1622 by Marie de’ Medici. In 1628 he became a Master in the Antwerp Guild of St Luke before leaving for Paris where he established a considerable reputation not only as a painter but also as a print publisher and tapestry designer. In 1648 he was one of the founders of the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture but soon after returned to Brussels before settling in Antwerp.
This painting is a preparatory oil sketch for a tapestry design depicting the reconciliation between the armies of Romulus and Titus Tatius. Although its authorship has long been in dispute it has been recently been confirmed as being a work by Justus van Egmont. In the past Dr. Ludwig Burchard thought the design could be attributed to Rubens on the basis that it was compositionally similar to a picture of the same subject by Rubens and his studio in the Alte Pinakothek, Munich (Inv. No. 350).1 On this basis he thought that the present picture was a copy after a composition by Rubens for the tapestry design. In 1997 Professor Elizabeth McGrath revised this theory drawing attention to the stylistic similarities between this picture and the Romulus Cycle,2 given by Arnout Balis to van Egmont.3 Here she convincingly argues that the proportions, facial features and the characteristic use of stooping soldiers as compositional devices to enclose the action, all point to the same hand, likely that of van Egmont. We are grateful to Professor Elizabeth McGrath of the Warburg Institute and Prisca Valkeneers’s of the Rubenianum for subsequently confirming this attribution to van Egmont following first hand inspection (March 2013). This work is to be included in Prisca Valkeneers’s forthcoming catalogue raisonné on the artist to be published in 2018.
1. E. McGrath, Corpus Rubenianum, Subjects from History, 1997, part XIII, vol. 2, p. 125.
2. Ibid., p. 149.
3. Ibid., p. 148.
This painting is a preparatory oil sketch for a tapestry design depicting the reconciliation between the armies of Romulus and Titus Tatius. Although its authorship has long been in dispute it has been recently been confirmed as being a work by Justus van Egmont. In the past Dr. Ludwig Burchard thought the design could be attributed to Rubens on the basis that it was compositionally similar to a picture of the same subject by Rubens and his studio in the Alte Pinakothek, Munich (Inv. No. 350).1 On this basis he thought that the present picture was a copy after a composition by Rubens for the tapestry design. In 1997 Professor Elizabeth McGrath revised this theory drawing attention to the stylistic similarities between this picture and the Romulus Cycle,2 given by Arnout Balis to van Egmont.3 Here she convincingly argues that the proportions, facial features and the characteristic use of stooping soldiers as compositional devices to enclose the action, all point to the same hand, likely that of van Egmont. We are grateful to Professor Elizabeth McGrath of the Warburg Institute and Prisca Valkeneers’s of the Rubenianum for subsequently confirming this attribution to van Egmont following first hand inspection (March 2013). This work is to be included in Prisca Valkeneers’s forthcoming catalogue raisonné on the artist to be published in 2018.
1. E. McGrath, Corpus Rubenianum, Subjects from History, 1997, part XIII, vol. 2, p. 125.
2. Ibid., p. 149.
3. Ibid., p. 148.