Lot 26
  • 26

Yves Tanguy

Estimate
350,000 - 450,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • Yves Tanguy
  • LUMEN
  • signed Yves Tanguy and dated 49 (lower right)
  • oil on canvas
  • 30.5 by 26cm.
  • 12 by 10 1/4 in.

Provenance

Galleria d'Arte del Naviglio, Milan (1953)
Private Collection, Milan (1963)
Finarte, Milan
Acquired from the above by the present owner in 1978

Exhibited

New York, Pierre Matisse Gallery, Exhibition of Paintings, Gouaches and Drawings, 1950, no. 4
Milan, Galleria del Naviglio, Yves Tanguy, 1953, illustrated in the catalogue
Rome, Galleria dell'Obelisco, Yves Tanguy, 1953

Literature

Kay Sage Tanguy et al., Yves Tanguy. Un Recueil des ses œuvres / A Summary of his Works, New York, 1963, no. 409, illustrated p. 176
Patrick Waldberg, Yves Tanguy, Brussels, 1977, illustrated p. 271


To be included in the revised version of the Yves Tanguy Catalogue Raisonné currently in preparation by the Pierre and Tana Matisse Foundation.

Condition

The canvas is unlined and there is no evidence of retouching under ultraviolet light. Apart from some paint shrinkage in the areas of thick impasto (visible in the catalogue illustration) this work is in very good original condition. Colours: In comparison to the printed catalogue illustration, the colours are overall fresher, and the yellows are less pronounced in the original.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

The iconography of Tanguy's painting was inspired by his childhood summers spent near Finistère in Brittany on the western coast of France, overlooking the Atlantic Ocean. It was there that he observed the expanses of the sea and the objects floating on water or washed up on the shores, elements that, subjectively transformed, frequently appear in the dream world of his mature œuvre. Painted in 1949, Lumen was executed while Tanguy was living in America, where he moved shortly after the outbreak of World War II. Populated by evocative biomorphic shapes, this work is characteristic of the artist's enigmatic landscapes and abandoned fields representing an alternative, fantastic world.

 

After his move to America, Tanguy adopted a soft, muted palette visible in the present painting: 'In this country white and gray became favorite colors, and were used to bind and oppose his stronger hues – "nasturtium, coq de roche, poplar leaf, rusty well-chain, cut sodium, slate, jelly-fish and cinnamon," as Breton once defined them' (James Thrall Soby, Yves Tanguy (exhibition catalogue), The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1955, p. 19). Another characteristic of his paintings from this period is the disappearance of the horizon line, as the land and sky gradually merge into each other. Tanguy 'made more and more frequent use of one of his most poetic inventions - the melting of land into sky, one image metamorphosed into another, as in the moving-picture technique known as lap-dissolve. The fixed horizon was now often replaced by a continuous and flowing treatment of space, and in many paintings of the 1930s and 1940s, it is extremely difficult to determine at what point earth becomes sky or whether objects rest on the ground or float aloft. The ambiguity is intensified by changes in the density of the objects themselves, from opaque to translucent to transparent, creating a spatial double entendre' (ibid., pp. 17-18).