- 67
Poetical Miscellany--M[ennes], Sir J[ohn] and Ja[mes] S[mith].
Description
- Musarum Deliciae: Or, The Muses Recreation. Conteining severall select Pieces of sportive Wit. For Henry Herringman, 1655
- PAPER
Provenance
John R.B. Brett-Smith, the sale of his library at Sotheby's, 27 May 2004, lot 418
Literature
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
This celebrated miscellany contains a number of poems by two notable royalists. One, Sir John Mennes (1599-1671), served as an admiral before and during the Civil War, as well as (somewhat incompetently) after the Restoration, besides being for some time governor of North Wales. The other, Mennes's friend James Smith (1605-67), was a chaplain who served on certain naval expeditions before the Civil War, leading a quieter (if somewhat debauched) life of steady advancement in the church thereafter. Both men wrote jovial, racy, ribald, "sportive" verses which for some years were widely circulated in manuscript among the coteries of city gentlemen, wits, would-be courtiers and actors of the period. Their verse was subversive, supporting royalist propaganda, and very influential on the development of Restoration genres such as the burlesque.
The canon of both Mennes and Smith, partly based on Musarum Deliciae, has now been established by Raylor (pp.217-40). He notes that not only has it been a source of confusion to attribute indiscriminately all the contents of this volume to Mennes and Smith -- the publication is essentially a poetical miscellany (though not recorded in Case) -- but that there is also "no evidence" for the assumption that they edited it ("and much against it"). The implication in "The Stationer to the Ingenious Reader" is that the publisher, Herringman himself, edited it. Raylor argues that of the 45 poems eight can be attributed to Mennes and Smith, and nineteen to others, while the remaining seventeen anonymous poems include a few which might be attributable to them on stylistic grounds.