- 621
A Fabergé jewelled vari-coloured gold and guilloché enamel carnet, Workmaster Michael Perchin, St. Petersburg, 1899-1903
Description
- 10.4 by 7.2cm, 4 1/8 by 2¾in.
Provenance
Literature
Michael Conforti, The Taft Museum: European Decorative Arts, 1995, p.508
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
Franz Birbaum, Fabergé's head designer from 1895 until 1917, recorded in his memoir that the firm's jewellers used the Hermitage collections for study. He observed that they concentrated especially upon the art of the period of Empresses Elizabeth and Catherine II - "many of those articles were copied with great precision and were later used as models for the creation of new compositions." This carnet made by Michael Perchin, the firm's first head workmaster, is an exceptionally sumptuous example of how Fabergé adapted 18th century forms and motifs to produce such a composition.
The form of the carnet, with the covers pinned shut by a pencil, is based on a type that was fashionable in Paris in the mid 18th century. Its controlled design, however, evokes the elegant classicism of the early years of the reign of Louis XVI. Further, the painted decoration of leafy tendrils and simulated moss agate derive from the work of Parisian goldsmiths of the same period. Such selective gleaning from the past is typical of Fabergé, as are the subtle modifications introduced: the slightly larger scale; the exuberance of the chasing of the floral detail; the use of more dramatic engine-turning and the remarkable quality of the enamel, for which the firm was so widely admired. The result was a new and very individual work of art.
Fabergé appears to have made relatively few carnets of this form and of those recorded several have distinguished provenances. They include one, enamelled in pink and oyster white, in the collection of H.M. the Queen of the Netherlands (illustrated Fabergé, Munich, 1986, no 472); a second, decorated with pink and white enamel stripes, given by Emperor Nicholas II to the actress Elizabeth Balletta in 1902 (illustrated Fabergé/Cartier, Munich, 2003, no. 113); and a third, enamelled in translucent salmon pink and inset with a miniature of Empress Alexandra Fedorovna, possibly suggesting an Imperial provenance, now in the Marjorie Merriweather Post Collection, Hillwood, Washington DC (inv. 11.77, illustrated Fabergé, Munich, 1986, no 507).
Most intriguing in the context of the present fully marked example is the existence of a replica, unmarked, in the Taft museum Cincinnati (inv 1932.121, illustrated Conforti, op.cit, p.508). The Taft carnet was purchased for the collection from the dealer Seligmann in New York in December 1905. Such almost contemporary duplication of works by Fabergé is not unique. For another example of this, compare a jewelled gold and bloodstone carnet, by Michael Perchin, formerly in the Wernher collection, Luton Hoo, and a parallel, but unmarked, version in the Thyssen collection (both illustrated Anna Somers Cocks and Charles Truman, The Thyssen-Bornemisza collection: Renaissance jewels, gold boxes and objets de vertu, London, 1984, pp.308/9).