- 85
Schoenberg, Arnold.
Description
- Autograph manuscript commentary on the Fourth String Quartet and the Violin Concerto, with autograph music, signed three times ("ArnoldSchoenberg")
2 pages, folio (c.34 x 23.5cms), New York, 20 October 1937, creasing along central fold
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
This is a very rich and comprehensive critique, in which Schoenberg makes observations on the peculiarities of Schirmer's edition of the Fourth Quartet Op.37 and Greissle's piano arrangement of the Violin Concerto. Schoenberg praises the beautiful edition of the Quartet in general, but observes that certain typographical elements are exaggerated, expressing the fear that the accentuation marks have been taken to extremes and will soon be used reversed to spell out the mirror canons. Schoenberg writes out the incorrect and corrected versions of the cello part at bar 109, but these are not observed in Schirmer's edition, so this manuscript may be a commentary on "certain peculiarities" rather than intended proof corrections. He lists three general aspects of Schirmer's edition that he feels are overdone: 1) he finds the time signatures in the score far too large; 2) he had expected Schirmer to fit more bars on a page, so that it should not be more than seventy pages long; 3) it would have been better if the movements started on new pages.
Turning to Greissle's piano score [of the Violin Concerto], Schoenberg suggests that he has a moderate pianist try out the arrangement and, if he cannot play it fluently (provided it's the score that's at fault), then simplify it, admitting that coping with the accidentals, rhythms and themes is inevitably difficult, recommending he take as his model the arrangements of his Suite Op.25 and Pierrot Lunaire, rather than the edition of the Wind Quintet
...Du solltest absolut einen mässig guten Pianisten es dir vom Blatt vorspielen lassen und was er nicht fliessend spielen kann, (wenn auch fehlerhaft) erleichtern! Der Auszug wird dann noch immer schwer genug sein durch die [accidentals in musical notation], durch die Rhythmen und durch die Thematik! Seine einzige Schönheit kann in der leichtern Spielbarkeit bestehen und das Klavier klingt nicht am besten, wenn es viel zu spielen hat, sondern wenn alles gut in der Hand liegt...