- 38
Visscher, Nicolas Jansz
Description
Broadsheet (20 1/4 x 23 1/2 in.; 514 x 597). Second state of the map showing t' Fort Kasimier but not Philadelphia, handcolored in outline, cartouche and vignettes of an Indian settlement and animals fully handcolored; light toning, small split at bottom of center fold.
Literature
Condition
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.
Catalogue Note
Although this map, originally published in 1655, is largely derived from Jansson's map of 1651, it is extremely important for providing a view of Manhattan island. This is probably the second published view of New York (according to Burden), the first being that of Joost Hartgers in 1651. Stokes places the date of the view in the autumn of 1652 since the building on the far left was not constructed until April 1652. In addition, a wall was constructed for security in 1653 which does not appear in this view. The second state of the map is the earliest available to collectors, as the first state is of extreme rarity, with only three copies known.
Improvements on the Jansson map included the addition of the Zuyder Zee below Cape Cod, Chesapeach became Chesapeack, and on Long Island sound Milfort and Ailfort became Strotfort and Milfort respectively. t'kocks Rack is added on the west bank of the Hudson River near Manhattan.
The second state of the map was also the source of the first boundary dispute between William Penn and Lord Baltimore of Maryland. Penn contested two points. First was Lord Baltimore's belief that his charter included the Dutch settlements on the east side of the Delmarva Peninsula. Second, Penn questioned whether Baltimore's northern boundary should be at the 40o of north latitude as accurately surveyed or at the latitude where it was thought to have been in 1632 when Baltimore's charter was granted. In 1685, the Privy Council decided in Pennsylvania's favor, and the Delmarva Peninsula was divided equally from the 40o of latitude as far south as Cape Henlopen, with Visscher's map used in that determination. Unfortunately Visscher placed Cape Henlopen twenty-five miles too far south; it was actually located at the protrusion of land that the mapmaker called Cape Cornelius. Because of that, Baltimore lost thousands of acres to Penn.