- 54
Peter de Tarantaise, Commentaria in epistolam Pauli ad Romanos, in Latin, manuscript on vellum
Description
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
text
Peter de Tarantaise (c. 1225-1276), was a Dominican preacher from south-eastern France who graduated from the University of Paris as a master of sacred theology in 1259, and won acclaim as a professor in that subject. He became archbishop of Lyons in 1272 and cardinal-bishop of Ostia in 1273, and while in that office he pronounced the funeral oration for St. Bonaventure. He was elected successor to Gregory X, whose intimate adviser he was, and took the name of Innocent V, becoming the first Dominican pope. He was essentially a scholarly peaceful man, who sought in his pontificate to reconcile the Guelphs and the Ghibellines in Italy, restore peace between Pisa and Lucca, and meditate between Rudolph of Hapsburg and Charles of Anjou; but unfortunately he reigned only a few months, dying on 22 June 1276.
The present text is his commentary on the Pauline epistles: Romans (erroneously published in 1478 as the work of Nicholas of Gorran; for incipits correctly attributed see Stegmüller, Repertorium, iv, nos. 6882-3, where he lists over 100 manuscripts; but not the present one). This manuscript appears too modest for a Parisian university copy, and is too large to be a volume for private devotion; much about it suggests it was made for public reading in a monastery in northern France.