- 57
John Russell R.A. 1745-1806
Description
- John Russell R.A.
- Portrait of Thomas Sheppard; and of his sister, Mary Sheppard
- A pair, the former signed l.r.: J.Russell, R.A. Pinxt 1792., the latter signed l.r.: JRussell R.A.Pinxt 1890.
- both oil on canvas
Provenance
Sotheby's, 30th November 2000, lot 12
Literature
George C. Williamson, John Russell, R.A., 1894, p158
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
The sitters were the children of Edward Sheppard (1741- 1808), and Elizabeth, daughter of the heir of John Harmer of Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, who had married in 1777. The Sheppard's were an old West-Country family of Fromefield, Somerset, and Edward was descended by marriage from Joseph Houlton, of Farley Castle, Somerset, High Sheriff of Wiltshire in 1696. Edward Sheppard was a merchant in the city of London, and moved to Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, where the family remained until the twentieth century. Thomas Harmer-Sheppard married firstly Isabella, daughter of his uncle, Henry Sheppard of Frome Selwood, and had a son, Edward. He married, secondly, Mary, the daughter of his uncle, John Sheppard, and had a son, John, and daughter, Mary. His sister, Mary, married Richard-Wilsonne Sheppard, and died in 1840, leaving a daughter.
At the time of these paintings, Russell was one of the most fashionable artists in England and it is interesting to note that in the late 1790's he priced his half length portraits at £80.15 compared to £70 for the equivelent from the late president of the Royal Academy, Sir Joshua Reynolds. Russell's distinction was further re-inforced by his royal appointments, coincidentally made in 1790 and 1792 the two years in which the present works were painted. In 1790, his principle exhibit at the Royal Academy was 'Her Majesty the Queen' and then he was styled as 'Painter to the King and Prince of Wales, and also to the Duke of York', exhibiting that year at the Academy a portrait of the Prince of Wales as President of the Royal Kentish Bowmen.
Russell's royal commissions had begun in 1789 with a portrait of Dr Willis, the celebrated Physician who had been summoned to attend to the King. The King's pleasure on seeing this work led to him commissioning the Queen's portrait and that of the Prince of Wales with the infant Princess Charlotte on her knee. This portrait was subsequently given to the Duchess of Brunswick Russell went on to paint Frederick, Duke of York on four occasions and he became a particular favourite at Court. Williamson (see Literature) relates how Russell's popularity with the Royal family led to Queen Charlotte herself helping collect his crayons from the floor when he let them slip from his hand whilst sketching her. Russell's sister-in-law, later handed down the story of how Russell took her into one of the royal palaces to see a particular picture in private quarters and gained easy access because the Prince Regent had unbuckled the 'Garter' from his knee, given it to Russell and told him to 'show them that and I expect they'll let you in at once' (Williamson, op.cit., p.59).