
Property from the Estate of Ambassador J. William Middendorf II, Rhode Island
The Enraged Ahasuerus
Lot closes
April 15, 11:55 AM GMT
Estimate
15,000 - 20,000 GBP
Current Bid
12,000 GBP
1 Bid
Reserve met
We may charge or debit your saved payment method subject to the terms set out in our Conditions of Business for Buyers.
Read more.Lot Details
Description
Property from the Estate of Ambassador J. William Middendorf II, Rhode Island
Attributed to Aert de Gelder
Dordrecht 1645–1727
The Enraged Ahasuerus
oil on canvas
unframed: 103.6 x 69.2 cm.; 40¾ x 27¼ in.
framed: 130.2 x 96.5 cm.; 51¼ x 38 in.
Karl Lilienfeld (1885–1966), Leipzig and The Hague, by 1914;
With Julius Böhler, Munich, 1927;
From whom acquired by Hedwig Ullmann (1872–1945), Frankfurt-am-Main;
Thence by descent, until 1972;
Private collection, Melbourne, by 1981;
Whence sold, New York, Sotheby's, 8 June 2017, lot 13;
Where acquired.
Rotterdam, Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, on loan by 1914;
Leipzig, Leipziger Kunstverein, Alter Meister aus Leipziger Privatbesitz, 15 November – 15 December 1914, no. 42 (as Arent de Gelder);
New York, Koetser Gallery, Dutch Paintings, 25 February – 25 March 1946, no. 9.
K. Freise, 'Neue Bilder in holländischen Sammlungen', in Der Cicerone, vol. IV, 1912, pp. 659–62, reproduced, fig. 7 (here and below as by Aert de Gelder);
K. Lilienfeld, Arent de Gelder. Sein Leben und seine Kunst, The Hague 1914, pp. 138–39, no. 30, reproduced pl. 20;
K. Lilienfeld, 'Die Austellung alter Meister aus Leipziger Privatbesitz', in Kunstchronik, vol. XXVI, 1915, p. 107;
E. Plietzsch, 'Holländische Bilder des 17. Jahrhunderts aus Leipziger Privatbesitz', in Monatshefte für Kunstwissenschaft, vol. VIII, 1915, p. 49;
D.R. van Fossen, The Paintings of Aert de Gelder, unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge 1969, no. 13;
J.-P. Foucart-Borville, 'Un tableau reconstitué au Musée d'Amiens...', in La revue du Louvre. Chronique des amis du Louvre, vol. XX, 1970, pp. 218–19, reproduced fig. 6, n. 59;
D. Lettieri, 'Text, Narrative and Tradition: Scenes from Esther by Aert de Gelder', in The J. Paul Getty Museum Journal, vol. VIII, 1980, pp. 75 and 82;
W. Sumowski, Drawings of the Rembrandt School, vol. V, New York 1981, under cat. no. 1072xx;
W. Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, Landau 1983, vol. II, under no. 731 (where described as reduced);
J. W. von Moltke, Arent de Gelder, Doornspijk, 1994, pp. 37–38 and 72, no. 25, reproduced pl. 25.
Between 1680 and 1687 De Gelder evidently became increasingly interested in the Book of Esther. Von Moltke (see Literature) lists no less than seventeen different paintings with subjects drawn from this one source. The subject of this painting is King Ahasuerus (Xerxes) of Persia, who reigned in the 5th century B.C., and who married the Jewish beauty Esther after dismissing his first queen Vashti. When her uncle Mordecai learnt of a decree from Xerxes's chief minister Haman to massacre all the Jews in Persia, he informed his niece, who at great risk to her own life, successfully interceded with the King. Haman was hanged on the gallows he had prepared for Mordecai, and Esther's valiant deed was recorded in the Purim letters, sent to all Jews throughout the Empire to commemorate their deliverance. Xerxes is clearly shown here discomfited, though whether this is with his first wife or (more likely) with the treachery of Haman cannot be certain.
The subject of Esther enjoyed great popularity with seventeenth-century Dutch artists, especially those of the Rembrandt circle. It has been suggested that these artists, as well as contemporary writers, may have been motivated by the contemporary analogy of the recent victory of the Dutch over the Spanish with the salvation of the Jews. De Gelder's own personal fascination with the subject may have been, as Von Moltke and Lettieri suggest, a combination of his preference for dramatic and unusual Old Testament subjects and exotic settings and costumes, perhaps betraying a personal interest in powerful female figures such as Esther, Tamar or Bathsheba. The former plausibly suggests that the present painting was most probably painted in 1685, the same year as the Esther and Mordecai in the Szépmuvészeti Museum in Budapest (see von Moltke, under Literature, p. 77 no. 35, plate 35). Another closely related small full-length of Esther of very similar format which was sold London, Phillips, 6 December 1988, lot 80, almost certainly dates from the same year. Both this and the present painting may, as Sumowski suggests, have originally formed part of larger compositions, an opinion supported in this work by the sudden cropping of the composition at right. The distinctive gilt goblet in this canvas also recurs in earlier related works, notably the Esther and Ahasuerus in the Musée de Picardie in Amiens (ibid., pp. 74-5, cat. no. 30, reproduced in color, plate XVI).
You May Also Like