拍品 27
  • 27

弗蘭克·奧爾巴赫 | 《通往畫室》

估價
1,200,000 - 1,800,000 GBP
Log in to view results
招標截止

描述

  • Frank Auerbach
  • 《通往畫室》
  • 款識:書題目並紀年1977兩次(背面)
  • 油彩畫板
  • 122.2 x 136.5公分,48 1/8 x 53 3/4英寸

來源

馬勃洛畫廊,倫敦
私人收藏(1978年購自上述畫廊)
芒努斯·庫努夫(家族傳承自上述藏家)
倫敦蘇富比,2015年2月10日,拍品編號32(由上述藏家委託)
現藏家購自上述拍賣

出版

展覽圖錄,倫敦,海沃德美術館;愛丁堡,水果市場美術館,《弗蘭克·奧爾巴赫》,1978年5-8月,18頁載圖

羅伯特·休斯,《弗蘭克·奧爾巴赫》,倫敦1990年,99頁,品號60,載彩圖

威廉·菲弗,《弗蘭克·奧爾巴赫》,紐約2009年,281頁,品號389,載彩圖

Condition

null
我們很高興為您提供上述拍品狀況報告。由於敝公司非專業修復人員,在此敦促您向其他專業修復人員索取諮詢,以獲得更詳盡、專業之報告。

準買家應該檢查每款拍品以確認其狀況,蘇富比所作的任何陳述均為專業主觀看法而非事實陳述。準買家應參考有關該拍賣的重要通知(見圖錄)。

雖然本狀況報告或有針對某拍品之討論,但所有拍賣品均根據印於圖錄內之業務規則以拍賣時狀況出售。

拍品資料及來源

Richly material, tactile and immersive, To the Studios is the second painting in the series of the same name, begun by Frank Auerbach in 1977. Auerbach’s beloved studio in Mornington Crescent, which had been occupied by Leon Kossoff and Frances Hodgkins prior to Auerbach’s arrival in 1954, is still inhabited by the painter to this day. In 1977, however, Auerbach dreaded being turned out of his place of work. The anxiety that such a prospect induced in him inspired the third crucial landscape motif of Auerbach’s career: the exterior of his studio and the surrounding buildings. Even though Auerbach was able to keep his studio by purchasing it from his landlord, this motif continued until 1994 through nineteen paintings and innumerable sketches. Together they belong to an inimitably personal and deeply emotive corpus of North London cityscapes that includes his pictures of Primrose Hill from the 1950s and 1960s, as well as the auburn representations of the corner between Camden High Street and Mornington Crescent. With two works from the series owned by Tate, London, To the Studios is unanimously considered one of the finest series in Auerbach’s oeuvre: these works herald the unmistakable 'all-at-onceness' of Auerbach’s vision across an exquisite range of captured moments. The present work draws upon Walter Sickert’s cityscapes of North London, as well as the quality of “individuality, independence, fullness and perpetual motion” within the landscapes of Auerbach’s mentor and teacher David Bomberg (Frank Auerbach in conversation with Catherine Lampert in: Exh. Cat., London, Hayward Gallery, Frank Auerbach, 1978, p. 8).

Rendered in a thickly-churned impasto painstakingly scraped away and re-applied, To the Studios presents a unity of architectonic structures, organic swirls, swathes and daubs, and luscious chromatic combinations of earthy autumnal hues with vegetal, swampy greens. The viewer identifies gables, archways, stairwells and rooftops amongst a symphony of nameless shapes; each such item – familiar or otherwise – forms a component of this meticulous representation of a portion of the artist’s lived experience. Influenced by the landscapes of Delacroix, Courbet, Daumier and Cézanne, Auerbach describes his own method as “always a process of invention… always a process of suddenly seeing a unity in the disparate things one’s trying to hold together” (Frank Auerbach in conversation with Catherine Lampert in: Exh. Cat., London, Tate Britain, Frank Auerbach, 2015, p. 152). The diligence and care with which Auerbach famously scrapes and reapplies paint in his compositions is an attempt to transmute the perpetual shift of lived experience – its constant alterations and corrections, its eternal and unstoppable flux. It is only “when the conclusion occurs and I feel I’ve been lucky enough to find some sort of whole for this overwhelming and unmanageable heap of sensations…[that] I think the previous attempts have contributed” (Ibid., p. 142). The raw tactility of the paint in To the Studios conjures not just the brute tangibility of the world around us, but also the sheer miracle of materiality itself.

For the majority of these paintings, Auerbach focused on a view involving the red-brick, Victorian house containing his studio to the left – signposted in crimson capitals – and a block of more modern houses to the right. These poles are separated by an inchoate, Escher-like hotchpotch of girders and beams reminiscent of vaulting Tudor stairwells. The backs of terraces are elided in the middle-ground, and the upper floors of the Egyptian Revival building Greater London House –  often gleaming white, but in this case an ochre-framed blue –  are visible in the distance at centre-right. For these compositions, Auerbach changed his practice and created sketches in situ before returning to his studio to work on the final painting over the course of many months. The earthy colour scheme with which Auerbach painted this space reflects not just the organic processes by which London breathes and changes, but the artist’s love and need for these buildings and their contents. Auerbach describes himself at this time as being “in continual fear”, fear “of being thrown out or something going wrong, and I may say that before [the studio] was re-built I think the Council… would have disapproved of it. I needed this space like a drowning man to a raft” (Frank Auerbach cited in: Catherine Lampert, Frank Auerbach: Speaking and Painting, London 2015, p. 171). One has the sense, in looking at To the Studios, of a very human activity: the return to what one knows and what one does as a means of coming to terms with one’s nostalgia for a present too easily envisaged as past.

Auerbach’s studio was modernised by Long & Kentish in 1990. The resultant space possessed several advantages over the previous – including sources of radically increased natural light and facilities for storing and accessing Auerbach’s enormous stock of paint – but it was, of course, distinct from the previous. The To the Studios series is a kind of record or document of the architectural, chromatic and emotional properties of a certain place at a certain time, for a certain person. As Robert Hughes expressed, “what counts most in Auerbach’s work is the sense it projects of the immediacy of experience… Like all painting, good or bad, it is coded. But the clear purpose of its codes is to clarify Auerbach’s struggle, not to ‘express himself’, but to stabilise and define the terms of his relations to the real, resistant and experienced world: which is what art must do, today as yesterday” (Robert Hughes, Frank Auerbach, London 1990, p. 214).