Lot 238
  • 238

A rare German parcel-gilt silver statue representing a sitting faun, probably Johann II Mittnacht Augsburg circa 1710 (maker's mark only)

Estimate
50,000 - 80,000 EUR
bidding is closed

Description

  • A rare German parcel-gilt silver statue representing a sitting faun, probably Johann II Mittnacht Augsburg circa 1710 (maker's mark only)
  • silver
  • 38 cm high, 1 407 g ; 15in. high, 45oz 5dwt
the base resting on four paw feet, embossed with rocks and foliage, applied with lizards on leaves, the stem shaped as a sitting faun holding a pumpkin, with garlands of vine and grapes probably later painted, the pumpkin forming flask 

Condition

In overall fairly good condition. The gilding fainting on the pumping. Needs a good cleaning. Spectacular piece. Very nice quality. Unusual subject. Maker's mark and assay scratches under the foot rim. A hole on a wine leaf. The vine belt to be correctly refixed. Very nice piece. Good weight.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

This unusual piece is only stamped with maker's mark under the base border, together with assay scrape. This mark is attributed by Selling to Johann Mittnacht III, but Rosenberg attributes it to his father Johann Mittnacht II, who became a master in 1705. On a stylistical point-of-view, it seems more appropriate to attribute it to the father. Moreover, Seling does not illustrate the father's mark.