Lot 138
  • 138

Marlene Dumas

Estimate
90,000 - 120,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • Marlene Dumas
  • Young Boy (Hang Up)
  • signed, titled and dated 1996
  • watercolour and iridescent paint on paper
  • 120 by 70 cm. 47 1/4 by 27 5/8 in.

Provenance

Gallery Koyanagi, Tokyo
Private Collection, Tokyo
Sotheby's, London, 16 February 2012, Lot 161
Acquired from the above by the present owner

Exhibited

Tokyo, Museum of Contemporary Art; Marugame, Marugame Genichiro-Inokuma Museum of Contemporary Art, Marlene Dumas: Broken White, April 2007 - January 2008

Literature

Ilaria Bonnacossa, Dominic van den Boogerd, Mariussia Casadio and Barbara Bloom,
Marlene Dumas, London 2009, p. 140, illustrated in colour

Condition

Colour: The colour in the catalogue illustration is fairly accurate, although there are fewer magenta undertones visible in the original. Condition: The work is in very good condition. The sheet is attached verso to the backing mount in several places and undulates. The horizontal edges are deckled and there are artist’s pinholes in all four corners.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

Painted in a light, almost translucent watercolour that belies the brutality of the image it forms, Young boy (Hang Up) belongs to the series Youth and Other Demons, created by  Marlene Dumas in 1996. In Youth and Other Demons, Dumas depicted the fragile figures of lifeless children, executed in dark washes of paint that contrast starkly against white backgrounds. In shining a stark, white light on death, these apparently simple, matter-of-fact- pictures of death unadorned gain powerful strength when placed alongside the centuries-long tradition of the painters who have engaged in the depiction of death and mortality.  From early, primitive depictions of death rituals and the afterlife, to Flemish Vanitas paintings and Twentieth century depictions of the horrors of war, death is a subject that has long preoccupied creators alike.

As Dumas notes, “I’m interested in artists who take death as a model. So often Andy Warhol is only seen in relation to money. But for me, he’s one of the few artists whose art addresses death and the sentiments of our time without succumbing to sugary or over-dramatic imagery; a good synthesis between realism and artificiality” (Marlene Dumas, ‘Death as a Model’, Marlene Dumas: Resources and References, no date, online). While the work of Warhol, with its air of cool irony, may seem worlds away from Dumas’s artistic landscape, both artists’ approaches to death find commonality in their use of appropriation and their interest in the popular media’s almost fetishist presentation of the subject matter. Yet Dumas’s interest in death is equally historic as is it contemporary. Work directly related to canonical paintings such as David’s heroic The Death of Marat (1793) and Holbein’s eerily composed The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb (1521) show Dumas’s engagement with the history of death in European painting. They sit side-by-side with others based on shocking contemporary photographs. By melding art historical tropes and canonical precedents with media images and news clippings, Dumas has plundered the spectrum of death as image to present us with a conception of it as both eternal and in the raw present.

Yet in all this, without Dumas’s frank title, there is little in the image that visually suggests hanging. There seems to be no rope, no real sense of weight to the body, the head is bowed forward but not gruesomely so. As we look closer, this ambiguity extends to the body’s sexuality. Dumas plays again with our referential system, a penis is paired with feminine hips, breast morph into a chest as his top is suggestively rolled up. Long hair only obscures the matter further. In all of this, Dumas hints at a narrative that extends further than the portrayal of death, incorporating ideas surround sexuality and gender politics.

In creating a work that hovers between male and female bodies, between life and death, Dumas forces the viewer to participate, coercing out their assumptions and opinions regarding death and sexuality.  To able to imbue an image of such frankness with an equal sense of ambiguity attests to Dumas’s supreme skill as a figurative painter. It is a skill that tests the limits of figuration both in its loose painterly handling and its ability to create an ambiguity of narrative that one only usually finds in abstraction. In doing this, it speaks to a core pillar of Dumas’s artistic quest, best summed up in her own words: “I wondered if one could paint death, death as an abstract thing, like the way you paint love or loss”, she wrote, “I was thinking about such questions even before I started making paintings on the subject” (Marlene Dumas conversation with Theodora Vischer, in; Exh. Cat.,London, Tate Modern (and travelling), Marlene Dumas: The Image as Burden, 2014-15, p. 167).

‘Art is, and always has been, a preparation for death.’  (Marlene Dumas cited in: Dominic van den Boogerd, ‘A Good Looking Corpse’, in: Exh. Cat., Venice, Fondazione Bevilacqua la Masa, Palazetto Tito, Marlene Dumas: Suspect, 2003, p. 21).