Lot 7
  • 7

A LARGE AMBER-GLAZED VASE SUI DYNASTY

Estimate
50,000 - 70,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • pottery
the globular body rising from a tall spreading foot to stepped shoulders, surmounted by a trumpet neck flaring at the rim, the exterior applied with bands of moulded animal masks suspending mock rings and seated spirits, interspersed between stylized palmettes and single lotus lappets, all above a band of lappets, the neck encircled by raised fillets between two bands of lotus lappets, the foot similarly decorated with raised fillets above a band of lotus lappets alternating with palmettes, applied overall with an amber-coloured glaze pooling at the recesses to a deeper ochre tone and coagulating just above the foot, Japanese wood box

Provenance

Mayuyama & Co. Ltd., Tokyo. 

Exhibited

Sui Tō no bijutsu aki no tokubetsu tenrankai [Fine art of Sui and Tang special exhibition], Kyoto National Museum, Kyoto, 1959, cat. no. 143.
Chūgoku meitou ten [Chinese ceramics. A loan exhibition of selected masterpieces], Hiroshima Fukuya, Hiroshima, 1961, cat. no. 7.
Chūgoku tōji meiho ten [Exhibition of the great works of Chinese ceramic], The Gotoh Museum, Tokyo, 1966.
Chūgoku bijutsu ten series. Rikucho no bijutsu [Chinese art exhibition series. The art of Six Dynasties], Osaka Art Museum, Osaka, 1975, cat. no. 14.
Tokubetsuten tōji [Tang pottery and porcelain], Nezu Institute of Fine Arts, Tokyo, 1988, cat. no. 6. 
Chūgoku tōji bi wo miru kokoro [Chinese Ceramics, Enlightening through Beauty], Sen-oku Hakuko Kan Bunkan, Tokyo, 2006, cat. no. 7.

Literature

Fujiō Koyama, ed., Sekai tōji zenshū. Chūgoku Sui Tō hen [Collection of World Ceramics: Sui and Tang Dynasty], vol. 9, Tokyo, 1961, pl. 49.
Masahiko Satō and Hasebe Gakuji , Sekai tōji zenshū. Sui Tō [The complete works of world ceramics. Sui and Tang], vol. 11, Tokyo, 1976, pl. 1.
Ryūsen Shūhō. Sōgyō shichijū shūnen kinen/Mayuyama: Seventy Years, Tokyo, 1976, vol. 1, pl. 96.
Masahiko Satō, Chūgoku tōji shi [The history of Chinese ceramics], Tokyo, 1978, pl. 33.
Sekai bijutsu daizenshu toyo hen: Sui Tō [New history of world art Orient: Sui and Tang], vol. 4, Tokyo, 1997, pl. 228.

Condition

There are three areas of overpaint/restoration (approx. 7x1cm each) running vertically up from the foot, across the lappet bands, and conjoining along the bottom horizontal raised rib above the foot. The raised rib with an area of crack (approx. 1cm) with associated chips. There is restoration to two of the animal mask ring handles, with associated small chips to the mask. The rim with minor nibbles/chips and glaze flakes elsewhere. There are minor losses to the extremities of the applied decoration, and deposits of sand around the edges. In general, there are some minor glaze firing imperfections characteristic with age, including firing cracks and frits. There is minor glaze inconsistencies across the surface. The glaze appears to be of a more matt texture and slightly darker tone compared to the catalogue illustration.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

Catalogue Note

Elegantly potted and finely decorated, the present vase is covered with a glaze that is beautiful and elegant like amber. Both its form and amber glaze are extremely rare and it appears to be unique. In form as well as in its lotus-lappet decoration, it is comparable to the so-called ‘lotus vases’ of baluster form that are a characteristic vessel type of the Southern and Northern Dynasties period (420-589). These demonstrated the strong influence of Buddhism that was quickly gaining popularity across China at this time of political turmoil and cultural exchange. However, the present piece differs from most “lotus vases” in that it is covered by a low-temperature lead-glaze, while the latter usually feature a high-temperature celadon glaze, which makes this vase particularly special and valuable.

Three lead-glazed vases of very similar form, but applied with face motifs instead of moulded animal masks suspending mock rings, were sold at Eskenazi Ltd., London, one now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, the second preserved in a private collection of art from the Six Dynasties period (220-581), the third in The T.T. Tsui Galleries of Chinese Art at the Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto; see Giuseppe Eskenazi and Hajni Elias, A Dealer’s Hand. The Chinese Art World Through the Eyes of Giuseppe Eskenazi, London, 2012, p. 163, fig. 153, and pl. 199, for images of the second and third vases; the third vase was sold in these rooms, 9th June 1992, lot 92, and is also illustrated in Royal Ontario Museum. The T.T. Tsui Galleries of Chinese Art, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, 1996, pl. 60 (Fig.1). The Tsui Museum of Art, Hong Kong, also once had a vase of that type, nearly identical to the Ontario piece, perhaps the vase now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, see The Tsui Museum of Art, Hong Kong, 1991, cat. no. 8, and The Tsui Museum of Art. Chinese Ceramics I: Neolithic to Liao, Hong Kong, 1993, pl. 63. See also another vase of the same shape, decorated with only nine moulded animal masks suspending mock rings, but otherwise undecorated, excavated from the tomb of Zhang Sheng (AD 595) of the Sui dynasty, in Anyang, Henan, and now in Henan Province Museum, published in Zhongguo chutu ciqi quanji [Complete Collection of Ceramic Art Unearthed in China], Beijing, 2008, Henan volume, pl. 31. Compare also a lead-glazed vase with similar moulded animal masks and comparable shape, but less well-proportioned than the present piece and with a shorter neck, excavated from the tomb of Xu Xianxiu (AD 571), Prince Wu’an of the Northern Qi dynasty (550-577), in Taiyuan, Shanxi, illustrated ibid., Shanxi volume, pl. 20 (Fig.2).

The moulded decorations on the present piece are commonly found adorning other vessel forms excavated from tombs of nobility and high-ranking officials from the same period in Northern China. For example, see a lead-glazed vase with a cover, decorated with similar lotus lappets, discovered in the Northern Qi tomb of Prince Shunyang, Kudi Huiluo (AD 562) and his wife, in Shouyang, Shanxi, illustrated ibid., pl. 10. Compare also a chicken-head ewer with dragon handle, decorated with stylised honeysuckle, and a low-foot vase decorated with animal masks suspending mock rings, both excavated from the tomb of Lou Rui (AD 570), Prince Dong'an of the Northern Qi in Taiyuan, Shanxi, illustrated ibid., pls 16-17 (Fig.3).

A vase excavated in Zibo, Shandong, of related shape and similar decorations and glaze to the present piece, is published ibid., Shandong volume, pl. 35 (Fig. 4). This lotus vase from Zibo is commonly believed to be covered with a high-temperature celadon glaze, but Hsie Mingliang from National Taiwan University has argued that it should be a low-temperature lead-glaze, see Zhongguo gudai qian youtao de shijie: Cong Zhanguo dao Tangdai [The World of Ancient Chinese Lead-Glazed Wares: From the Warring States to the Tang], Taipei, 2014, p. 75. Such debates have profound implications on the study of celadon-glazed wares as well as the origin and development of low-temperature lead-glazed Tang sancai (three-coloured) wares in Northern China.  As a lead-glazed vase the present vase offers important clues in these studies. For further discussions on the subject, see Suzanne G. Valenstein, A Handbook of Chinese Ceramics, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1989, p. 51-54.