Acquired from the above on 10 June 1846 by Jules-Paul-Benjamin Delessert (1773-1847);
Thence by inheritance to his brother François-Marie Delessert (1780-1868);
His deceased sale, Paris, Hôtel Delessert, 15 March 1869, lot 78, for FF4,100 (as Pierre Paul Rubens);
At which point presumably passing into the Hottinguer family, probably through being acquired at the above sale by Caroline Hottinguer, née Delessert, widow (m. 1858) of the late Baron Henri Hottinguer (1803-66), daughter of François Dellessert and last in line of the Delessert dynasty;
Thence by descent in the collection of the Barons Hottinguer until sold ('Ancienne Collection du Baron Hottinguer'), Paris, Christie's, 2 December 2003, lot 140 (as Circle of Rubens);
Acquired shortly after the sale by the present owner.
F. Delessert, Catalogue des Tableaux de M. François Delessert, Paris n.d., p. 62, cat. no. 156 (as Rubens);
C. Blanc, 'La Galerie Delessert,' in Gazette des Beaux-Arts, Paris, February-March 1969, pp.105-201.
The proposed dating of the present work to Rubens' second trip to Spain is supported by the recent discovery of another image beneath the existing paint layers representing either Philip IV (1605 - 1665) or his youngest brother Don Carlos (1607 - 1632), which appears to be of high quality and is clearly in the style of Velazquez, who since 1623 had been working in the employ of the Spanish King (see fig. 1). Intriguingly, no protoype of the hidden portrait by Velazquez is known today.
The physiognomy of the sitter visible in the x-radiograph image can be compared closely to Velazquez's bust length depiction of Philip IV in armour and a full-length portrait of the Infante Don Carlos, both today at the Prado, which are dated to around the same year that Rubens was in Madrid, when the Royal sitters were aged 23 and 21 respectively.1 That the age of the sitter in the hidden portrait corroborates closely with that in Velazquez's two aforementioned portraits clearly supports a likely date of execution for the underlying portrait to around 1628, precisely when Rubens was in Madrid and had access to Velazquez's studio in the Royal Palace, where he could have reused an existing canvas to produce the present portrait.
With regard to the execution of the painting, Rubens has adhered closely to the outlines of the figure in the underlying image, whilst altering the features of the sitter and adapting and developing the image through his own idiom and style, so that with the exception of the soft handling of the sitter’s ear - highly reminiscent of the style of Velazquez - there remains little trace of the Spanish prototype. Rubens has also moved the position of the collar (today visible as a pentimento as well as in the x-radiograph) and covered over what appears to be the outline of a hand in the lower left corner of the underlying image.
Recent technical analysis also reveals that the painting has been transposed to a later canvas, probably during the last quarter of the 19th century, a technique that was widely employed in France where the work is known to have been during that period. An analysis of the ground layers also provides an interesting insight into the likely development of the image as two layers of preparation exist: an original base layer of red, or roja de tierras, typical for works prepared in Madrid during the 17th century, covered by a clear grey preparation more in keeping with Flemish practice. Both paint layers however are both painted on top of the grey preparation, indicating the first artist preferred the use of a cooler ground for the image, yet notably there are no clear signs of separation between the two paint layers, further suggesting that Rubens merely adapted the original design and seemingly soon after the underlying image had been painted.
Just how close relations were between Rubens and Velazquez during the former’s second visit to Spain remains unknown. In a letter to his friend Peiresc, Rubens records that he was lodged in the Royal Alcázar during his stay in Madrid, where Velazquez is known to have worked, and furthermore it is recorded that the two artists journeyed to the Escorial together to see the celebrated works by Titian. The emergence of this portrait and the discovery of the underlying image would seem to provide further evidence of a close link between Rubens and Velazquez, even directly within the latter's own atelier. As to the possible identity of the sitter, most plausibly the portrait represents an important member of the court of Madrid, although it is tempting to surmise that Rubens may have been painting a portrait of Velazquez himself - a notion that is lent some considerable support by the likeness of the sitter to both the putative self-portrait by Velázquez in the Surrender at Breda, painted some six to seven years later in 1634-5, and the recently upgraded portrait in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. 2
Nieuwenhuys was one of the most successful dealerships on the continent in the 19th century. Chrétien Jean Nieuwenhuys was the main advisor and buyer for King Willem II of the Netherlands. His father Lambert had set up the business in 1805 in Brussels, and when Chrétien Jean died it was taken over by Charles Sedelmeyer (1837-1925), operating from Paris.
1. See F. Checa, Velazquez, The Complete Paintings, Antwerp 2008, p. 93, no. 24, reproduced and pp. 94-95, no. 25, reproduced respectively.
2. See J. López Rey, Velázquez, Cologne 1996, vol. II, pp. 180-3, no. 73, reproduced p. 181 and opposite ‘Contents’ (detail of the putative self-portrait).
Online Registration to Bid is Closed for this Sale. Would you like to watch the live sale?Watch Live Sale