- 80
Circle of Andrea Riccio (c. 1470-1532) Italian, Padua, early 16th century
Description
- Sleeping nymph
- bronze, on a later painted wood base
- Circle of Andrea Riccio (c. 1470-1532) Italian, Padua, early 16th century
Provenance
Literature
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
Wilhem von Bode’s firm attribution of the Berlin bronze to Riccio has been generally accepted until recently. Krahn (op.cit., p116) attributed it to the circle of Riccio, in a detailed study which identified it as a prime example of the model made in Padua, 1530-40 . However, Avery has proposed an alternative theory of a Mantuan sculptor active in the early 16th century for the Fitzwilliam bronze. The latter was acquired by Colonel Boscawen from the dealer Alfred Spero as a work by the Milanese sculptor, Antico. Both authors have noted a bronze sold in Sotheby’s, London, 12th July 1979, lot 169, as a further cast of the Nymph, but it should be excluded from this group because it is of inferior quality, without comparable decoration in the hair.
The facture of the present Sleeping Nymph compares more closely with the hammered surface of the Berlin cast, a technique often associated with Riccio and Paduan bronzes. By contrast the Fitzwilliam Nymph has a smooth surface and sharper details, such as in the teeth, mouth and eyes. The Fitzwilliam version lacks a comparable diadem to the present and Berlin bronzes, but has more detail in the ribbons and pearls in the hair. The tree in the Berlin bronze is cast separately and it must be supposed that all the figures originally had some sort of support for the right arm, most likely a tree as in the Berlin version.
RELATED LITERATURE
W. Bode, The Italian bronze statuette of the Renaissance, rev. ed. by J.D. Draper, New York, 1980, p.20, pl. XXXIII; L. Planiscig, Andrea Riccio, Vienna, 1977, pp.420-3, fig. 506; V. Avery, Vulcan’s Forge in Venus’ City. The Story of Bronze in Venice 1350-1650, New York, 2011, p. 131, fig. 10.31